When people invoke “Western values,” they usually mean something very specific, even if they don’t realize it. Liberty. Equality. Tolerance. A liberal ethos rooted in the Enlightenment legacies of Britain and France. Rights before duties. The individual before the collective. It sounds noble. And, to many, it sounds like the whole story. But it isn’t.
There was another West. One just as European, just as foundational, yet almost completely erased from memory. The Prussian West.
Where the Anglo-French tradition celebrates liberty, the Prussian tradition emphasized duty. Where liberalism glorifies individual autonomy, the Prussian worldview demanded service to something greater: the family, the state, or even one’s internal code of discipline, such as religion.
Friedrich Nietzsche was no nationalist, but his critique of modern decadence resonates with this older Germanic ethos. He foresaw a Europe losing its sense of meaning, a civilization drifting toward mediocrity and comfort, populated by “last men” who no longer believed in anything higher than themselves.
Today’s West exalts choice but avoids consequence. It offers infinite freedoms but few frameworks for a purpose. Meaning, once forged through sacrifice and structure, is now outsourced to self-help mantras and fleeting identities.
But perhaps most corrosive is this: our politicians no longer feel the weight of duty. Across political, cultural, and corporate spheres, those in power often act not as stewards but as performers, trained to manage perception, not shoulder responsibility. The result? Drift. Cynicism. A leadership class allergic to consequences.
That worldview was not without flaws. But in discarding it wholesale, we lost the moral seriousness that once gave Europe direction. We flattened the West into a one-note civilization, eloquent on rights, silent on duties.
Without that forgotten tradition, we are not whole. What remains is a civilization brilliant in form, but hollowed in spirit.
The truth is, the West was never meant to stand on one leg. Liberty and duty were meant to coexist, two forces in tension, but also in harmony. Without liberty, society suffocates, falls into autocracy; without duty, it drifts, becomes anomic. One without the other breeds either oppression or decay. To restore balance, we must remember that rights gain meaning when anchored in responsibility, and that freedom flourishes best within a framework of purpose. The task now is not to return blindly to the past, but to recover its wisdom, to reforge a modern West that remembers not just how to be free, but why it must also be strong.
Very well written!